Wednesday, November 29, 2023
No menu items!
HomeNewsMight regulation have prevented Sam Bankman-Fried’s felony verdict?

Might regulation have prevented Sam Bankman-Fried’s felony verdict?

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was discovered responsible of all seven counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud within the late hours of Nov. 2. The jury delivered its verdict in lower than 10 minutes after almost 4 hours of deliberation, leaving his dad and mom to fall silent within the crowded courtroom on the Southern District Court docket of New York. 

Over the course of his prolonged trial, my ideas stored returning to: How did you come to be right here? Might all of this hurt have been prevented? What can we do to keep away from the subsequent FTX?

Some say that current monetary laws might have prevented the collapse of FTX. Having to adjust to regulatory necessities, Bankman-Fried would by no means have been capable of commingle and embezzle buyer funds.

FTX used Alameda Analysis as a “fee processor,” as described by Bankman-Fried’s protection. Considered one of Alameda’s subsidiaries, Northern Dimension, had acquired deposits from FTX prospects because the change was based. With none company management, the businesses commingled funds. 

Commingling of funds could not essentially contain fraudulent intent, however it will probably nonetheless be problematic as a result of lack of transparency and accountability. In reality, it’s a “soiled phrase” in securities legislation, an legal professional observing Bankman-Fried’s trial defined.

Embezzlement, then again, sometimes entails intentional and fraudulent actions and happens when one in charge of funds makes use of the capital for private acquire or unauthorized functions. Bankman-Fried, in response to prosecutors, used billions of {dollars} in enterprise capital investments, actual property acquisitions and political donations for private acquire. None of those funds belonged to him.

With out company controls, his protection couldn’t show that the $8 billion lacking from purchasers was the results of the market downturn fairly than the misappropriation of funds.

Bankman-Fried had excessive ambitions. He dreamed of being the president of the USA. He thought rising FTX could be the one solution to cowl the billion-dollar gap on its stability sheet, however it was too late for FTX. As Warren Buffett properly mentioned, “You solely discover out who’s swimming bare when the tide goes out.”

In the long run, Bankman-Fried was caught not for crypto fraud however for conventional fraud. Theoretically, regulatory guardrails might have prevented him from commingling and embezzling funds, however the legislation received’t stop somebody who believes they’re uncatchable from doing incorrect. 

This text is for normal data functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas, and opinions expressed listed below are the writer’s alone and don’t essentially mirror or characterize the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.